Jordan D. Kurth

Research Assistant Professor


Curriculum vitae



General Internal Medicine

Penn State College of Medicine



Validity Evidence for a Daily, Online-delivered, Adapted Version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF)


Journal article


Jordan D. Kurth, David B. Klenosky
2020

Semantic Scholar DOI
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Kurth, J. D., & Klenosky, D. B. (2020). Validity Evidence for a Daily, Online-delivered, Adapted Version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF).


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Kurth, Jordan D., and David B. Klenosky. “Validity Evidence for a Daily, Online-Delivered, Adapted Version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF)” (2020).


MLA   Click to copy
Kurth, Jordan D., and David B. Klenosky. Validity Evidence for a Daily, Online-Delivered, Adapted Version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF). 2020.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{jordan2020a,
  title = {Validity Evidence for a Daily, Online-delivered, Adapted Version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF)},
  year = {2020},
  author = {Kurth, Jordan D. and Klenosky, David B.}
}

Abstract

ABSTRACT The International Physical Activity Questionnaire – Short Form (IPAQ-SF) is a globally-used self-report measure of physical activity (PA). Validity evidence exists; none has evaluated the IPAQ-SF with reduced recall time. This study evaluates absolute and relative agreement for PA at all intensities, and relative to recommended guideline classification through: (1) a daily, online-delivered adapted IPAQ-SF and (2) accelerometer (a) with a 10-minute bout minimum (TMBM) and (b) without (NBM). Fifty-five participants (mean 28.3 years, 61.8% females) wore an accelerometer and completed the IPAQ-SF for 7 consecutive days. IPAQ-SF and NBM correlations were acceptable (total PA 0.45, moderate-to-vigorous PA 0.38). IPAQ-SF underestimated NBM values. IPAQ-SF sensitivity compared to NBM guideline classification was 70%; specificity was 100%. Correlations with TMBM were weaker for all intensities. IPAQ-SF overestimated TMBM values. IPAQ-SF sensitivity compared to TMBM guideline classification was 77%; specificity was 55%. The adapted IPAQ-SF showed acceptable validity evidence for relative PA measurement.


Share



Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in